Montreal

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2221153]DontMindMe11, great report!! I've had my eye on Lola when I visit. I'm actually glad XO delivered for you.

Did any of the girls have an inordinate amount of tattoos? I'm old school. A few, unobtrusive tatts are tolerable, but there is too much full-on body art going on with some of the young girls.

Thanks again.[/QUOTE]Yes, I was afraid of enduring cancellations after the recent negative reports of XO but everything went smoothly with them. XO has always done right by me the few times I've used them, no cancellations. Lola is a girl you won't regret booking.

As far as tattoos, all the girls had low profile body art. Just a few small ones for most of the girls. Lola had 2 small ones that I actually felt added to her appeal and I'm like you, in that I don't like when girls have too many tattoos. I would recommend Paige to you because she actually had zero tattoos. Unfortunately, Quebecois girls in general have a high tendency for having body art, it's a shame really.

On the topic of shills. There are 4 to 5 names whose reviews I completely ignore whenever I see them. Browse the other board for a few months and you will know exactly who they are. Interestingly enough, a few members of the boys club have been fairly quiet in recent memory.

[QUOTE=ChubzyMaximus;2220985]Thanks for reports buddy!

Few specific questions?

1. Lola how was she with LFK / DFK?

2. How is Alexandra's English?

3. Paige how was she with LFK / DFK, any extras offered? What was upcharge If present? How is her English?

Thanks again![/QUOTE]1. Lola was a pretty good kisser. LFK was always available throughout, but I requested she use more tongue later in the session and she obliged. She then began doing tongue only kisses which were so hot. When she was on top of me and sensing I was getting closer to finishing she began kissing my neck and bombarding me with quick repeated pecks on the cheeks and lips. She kissed me like she was my girlfriend. GFE+, she would probably get even better the more comfortable she gets with you.

2. Alexandra's English is good. I had no problems talking to her in only English.

3. I liked kissing with Paige. We did slow and passionate LFK. She did use tongue but I hesitate to call it DFK because she doesn't like to go too deep into your mouth with her tongue. I was satisfied with LFK with tongue, and when a girl has a face that beautiful, any kissing will suffice in my opinion. She doesn't like things in her ass (her words) so anal is off the table, and CIM was offered for extra but I didn't partake. I wasn't charged any extras. I will say this, she is open minded as long as your very clean and treat her well. Also, her English is perfect.

[QUOTE=DontMindMe11;2221251]1. Lola was a pretty good kisser. LFK was always available throughout, but I requested she use more tongue later in the session and she obliged. She then began doing tongue only kisses which were so hot. When she was on top of me and sensing I was getting closer to finishing she began kissing my neck and bombarding me with quick repeated pecks on the cheeks and lips. She kissed me like she was my girlfriend. GFE+, she would probably get even better the more comfortable she gets with you.

2. Alexandra's English is good. I had no problems talking to her in only English.

3. I liked kissing with Paige. We did slow and passionate LFK. She did use tongue but I hesitate to call it DFK because she doesn't like to go too deep into your mouth with her tongue. I was satisfied with LFK with tongue, and when a girl has a face that beautiful, any kissing will suffice in my opinion. She doesn't like things in her ass (her words) so anal is off the table, and CIM was offered for extra but I didn't partake. I wasn't charged any extras. I will say this, she is open minded as long as your very clean and treat her well. Also, her English is perfect.[/QUOTE]Thanks dude, along with Safia From Xo Paige is someone who has been on my radar but she also has varying reviews. I wasn't big on DFK in past, but LFK was always appreciated. Now I'm starting to agree with some comments that have been made in prior statements, if someone is charging more than $220/ hour, LFK minimum should be included. Also, I'm in Barcelona currently. I'm finding that LFK / DFK is way more readily offered by providers here Vs Montreal.

Thanks again for the break down!

[QUOTE=DontMindMe11;2221190]On the topic of shills. There are 4 to 5 names whose reviews I completely ignore whenever I see them. Browse the other board for a few months and you will know exactly who they are. Interestingly enough, a few members of the boys club have been fairly quiet in recent memory.[/QUOTE]I wouldn't mention names. There are some sad, sad blokes who not only shill but go to the ends of the earth to try and get brownie points with the star providers. By mentioning names it will create an ISG vs Merb atmosphere. Let's not forget what an invaluable tool merb is.

Merb and ISG should be used as supplements to each other.

Sorry, I don't like delving into politics between the two boards, but one thing, It truly amazes me as to the lengths some of these chaps go to in order to get favoritism with providers. Recently, a MTL provider told me that she did not even know the existence of this board until one of her "friends" who is a John (my guess a frequent Merb poster) sent her a pic of the postings from this board regarding her via text which were a bit critical of her.

What a fucking parasite. Here is someone not being anything close to a friend but just trying to get brownie points with a hot provider. There was absolutely no reason to send this provider these texts?

I remember another prolific reviewer on merb wrote a provider a great review and one of the usual suspects sent the provider a screenshot of the review? Like, WTF? No where else in the world do you see shit like this on a local board?

We should strive not to give these imbeciles any more attention. Focus on the providers and what makes them awesome.

We should even come out with our own 2018 provider of the year / rookie of the year contest!

[QUOTE=ChubzyMaximus;2221768] It truly amazes me as to the lengths some of these chaps go to in order to get favoritism with providers. Recently, a MTL provider told me that she did not even know the existence of this board until one of her "friends" who is a John (my guess a frequent Merb poster) sent her a pic of the postings from this board regarding her via text which were a bit critical of her....................

What a fucking parasite. Here is someone not being anything close to a friend but just trying to get brownie points with a hot provider. There was absolutely no reason to send this provider these texts?.....................

We should even come out with our own 2018 provider of the year / rookie of the year contest![/QUOTE]Haha. As someone who was good at chatting up the ladies in high school and college, I remember there were always dweebs who claimed to have access to things I said and thought in order to curry favor with the girls. I got in trouble more than once. Sometimes I had no idea why. One thing's for sure, some guys will do almost anything for pussy.

Yes, I second your motion. We should have an ISG provider of the year and rookie of the year. I would encourage some decent Merb guys to participate. Perhaps people don't care to be negative on-line about shills. We could turn that around and vote for reviewers of the year. We can acknowledge fair and insightful reviewers.

If I ever decided to register on merb again under a different handle and post, I'm sure I wouldn't last long. It got to a point where I'd have to self censor every post in order to prolong my stay. Of course I got tired of it and that's all she wrote. Still, I wouldn't come on ISG to bad mouth any specific Merb member, despite what I may or may not know about them. There's no point. At the end of the day, I don't care as long as I can get accurate info about the girls. That is still possible even now, but you have to read between the lines in reviews threads sometimes. For example, I never considered seeing a certain girl for a second, since there wasn't much raving about kissing in many reviews. The specific acronym's don't have to be used, but the constant omission tells you what you need to know. That's not a good trend. The shilling is perhaps more widespread then 2 or 3 years ago, but it's mainly the increased dismissal and denial of differing opinions, which are readily deleted that is bad. And 'protecting' girls is very good for the site in way, but also the clients. Maybe it's just a trend with the times, but there seem to be less graphic upfront reviews for feat of giving offense. Girls maybe see that and feel encourage to give Merb a go. Or maybe someone tells their friend in an agency how much money she's making and all the white knights she has on the board. Etc. Does not matter. I think Merb deserves praise for the wealth of info it still gives. Just read critically, if you have specific beauty / acronym taste.

ISG on the other hand is lacking in info on independents who advertise on MERB. To be fair, I haven't seen anyone that appealing and definitely worth the price posting recently. ISG been good.

For figuring out which popular girls to pass on in the agencies. That works for me right now, since I've made up a list to bang out. Only started recently, but got a few on here I've never seen commented on.

Will review when I hit six or more.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2221926]Haha. As someone who was good at chatting up the ladies in high school and college, I remember there were always dweebs who claimed to have access to things I said and thought in order to curry favor with the girls. I got in trouble more than once. Sometimes I had no idea why. One thing's for sure, some guys will do almost anything for pussy.

Yes, I second your motion. We should have an ISG provider of the year and rookie of the year. I would encourage some decent Merb guys to participate. Perhaps people don't care to be negative on-line about shills. We could turn that around and vote for reviewers of the year. We can acknowledge fair and insightful reviewers.[/QUOTE]It is really sad how some just try for brownie points. I hope some of these starlets realize these guys are actually hurting them more then helping.

Yea we should plan our own recognition for provider, rookie, Indy, and reviewer of the year.

[QUOTE=MtlLocal;2222101]ISG on the other hand is lacking in info on independents who advertise on MERB. To be fair, I haven't seen anyone that appealing and definitely worth the price posting recently. ISG been good.[/QUOTE]There's some hot looking independents in Montreal. Some charge much more than the youngins' at the agencies. Some have to travel to get clients at those rates. They usually have slick photos and websites.

While many independents advertise on Merb, most of them don't have a lot of reviews on Merb either.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2222290]There's some hot looking independents in Montreal. Some charge much more than the youngins' at the agencies. Some have to travel to get clients at those rates. They usually have slick photos and websites.

While many independents advertise on Merb, most of them don't have a lot of reviews on Merb either.[/QUOTE]Never understood the concept of indies in MTL? Some charge up to CAD $500. Who would pay that when you could see an agency girl who is quite service oriented for at most CAD $250? I guess the benefit would be the indies have the luxury to see maybe 2 clients a day where an agency girl might be seeing 4-5? Provider fatigue does play a role sometimes.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2220765]Would you have a problem if we discussed the names of the obvious green board shills here at ISG?[/QUOTE]This was done previously, but deleted by the Mods FYI.

Best Regards
Smuler

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2222290]While many independents advertise on Merb, most of them don't have a lot of reviews on Merb either.[/QUOTE]The cheap priced Indy's on those scammer sites are always propped up by our favorite shiller.

Best Regards
Smuler

[QUOTE=Smuler;2223030]This was done previously, but deleted by the Mods FYI.

Best Regards
Smuler[/QUOTE]I'm sorry I don't remember. My experience with the ISG mods is they allow a lot of discourse. Depending on the city / country, some ISG mods are more active than others.

The green board mods are out of their fuckin' minds. The MTL reviews on ISG, the blue board and some on a U.S. centric site don't sync with the MTL green board. My posts sometimes get whacked for no rhyme or reason other than the Jolly Man or some other board bloke regular might be sensitive to my post.

As far as indys, I was thinking of the higher priced women. Some of them advertise on the green board and rarely are they reviewed. I do know what you mean our old friend seems to lock-in on a few lower priced indys and then relentlessly promotes them on the board. Makes you wonder if he's promising these girls endless promotion for some quid pro quo. It clearly happens on Yelp and other review sites.

Hi everyone,

Following up on previous post. Looking for advise on upcoming trip.

Preferred 18-23 years, natural chest, and "real" (GND / coed) type.

Any suggestions? So far I have read through and compiled the following options:

Stefania at Vogue.

Marina at Euphoria.

Emily at Euphoria.

Daphne at Indy.

Fanny at XO.

Laura at XO.

Dakota at XO.

Paige at VelvetLove.

Thanks in advance! I'll post reports after my trip.

[QUOTE=Sosa23;2224394]Hi everyone,

Following up on previous post. Looking for advise on upcoming trip.

Preferred 18-23 years, natural chest, and "real" (GND / coed) type.

Any suggestions? So far I have read through and compiled the following options:

Stefania at Vogue.

Marina at Euphoria.

Emily at Euphoria..[/QUOTE]Likely a great list. You could list at least 50 reviewed Montreal escorts and find relatively little variance between any of them.

Personally, based on your criteria, I would consider adding April Rose and Tessa of Mikes Mansion to your list. It gives you one more agency to consider and they both have outstanding reviews. April Rose is a cute redhead (usually) and those are hard to find.

[URL]http://www.mikesmansion.com/models.php[/URL]

And everyone who sees Scarlett and Meghan of XO seems very pleased. They meet your criteria. So did Margot but she isn't on the website any more. One of the most "real" girls at XO is Dasha, whose reviews on the various boards range from one of the absolute best they have ever had. To mediocre because she was upset at something going on in her personal life and talked too much about it. That to me is the ultimate definition of a "real" girl. So there are 3 more names to consider from XO.

[URL]http://www.escortsxo.com[/URL]

Finally, if you have a few kinks you like to explore, and don't mind the higher cost, don't forget about Sonia the Unicorn. She didn't get Rookie of The Year and Provider of the Year on the green board for no reason.

[URL]http://montrealunicornhealers.com/portfolio/sonia/[/URL]

[QUOTE=Sosa23;2224394]Hi everyone,

Following up on previous post. Looking for advise on upcoming trip.

Preferred 18-23 years, natural chest, and "real" (GND / coed) type.

Any suggestions? So far I have read through and compiled the following options:

Stefania at Vogue.

Marina at Euphoria.

Emily at Euphoria.

Daphne at Indy.[/QUOTE]I saw Evelyn at Mikes Mansion. DDG and very service oriented. I had a blast. CIM was restriction. She will fly you to Greece for extra, FIV was accepted. LFK / DFK also there. I'the take a look at her profile on their page. You can pre-book her too. After I wrote my review on the green board a few blokes said they didn't have a good time or had a so, so time. So she has a mix of reviews, keep that in mind.

Marina has some great reviews and gives good service from what I've been told. Very GFE.

Some of the vogue girls look great but no reviews. The ones that are there are usually by vogue regulars who write useless nonsense.

I would recommend Jessica from xxxtase she is back on schedule and has awesome reviews. She is cute and just a bit older than your criteria, but good service provider (been told by others not personal experience).

Also add Erika from euphoria.