Montreal

[QUOTE=Kabukicho;2459778]Is it known if any of the agencies are getting their inventory periodically tested going forward? Not for sti, but covid I mean.[/QUOTE]The girls are not their employee. And surely not their inventory It's up to the girl to get tested for sti. Same for COVID.

Seems like a good option, anybody seen her? Thanks.

[QUOTE=PGTour;2459833]Seems like a good option, anybody seen her? Thanks.[/QUOTE]If you like that style of girl go see Heaven. Better looking and an absolute sure thing on service. But I disclose having never heard of that Alycia. Hopefully others will help.

[QUOTE=WyattEarp;2459628]Hey, wasn't there a reliable and honest poster on the local board named pseudocode? If that is you mon amis, please stay here and share. I remember you were once burned seeing an unreliable escort where the local board basically wiped clean her checkered history before your interest. We have conversed via PM and your perspective was very helpful.[/QUOTE]I don't now about reliable, but yes that's my handle in the green board.

Yeah I used this board a while back only for my visit to Portugal and didn't realize people are active here for Montreal.

I have to apologize, I am not sure I figured out who you are yet. I mainly have been conversing with a user whose handle is Nature Boy. I may have chatted with you a bit in the past but I can't recall what it was about. Frankly, I didn't even know I got burned haha. I do notice one or two of my reviews in the past have disappeared but I guess I wasn't a frequent visitor enough to see what kind of conversation have transpired before they were taken down. I don't usually look at the follow-ups on my reviews. But now I am curious, do tell if you recall which girl it was about.

[QUOTE=ChubzyMaximus;2459632]It depends really about seeing newbies. Are they really newbies? Do they have experience coming from massage establishments? Are they already on SA? Two separate bookers recommended newbies to me, but they were already on SA for well over years and were rockstars when I saw them. Yea they were newbies as SP's but still very well experienced at making you happy. That's where pcode comes in when he says you got to talk to bookers, 100% correct.[/QUOTE]Still, I don't get the appeal. I still think the risk of having an undesirable meeting is higher that way, and on the other hand you can just wait for a few weeks or so while proper intel can ultimately be gathered. I bet the SP is going to perform just as well on her third week than on her first week. I can't think of a situation where an SP will be better on her first week of work than on her forth week of work. I mean, maybe, but I feel the chances of that happening is much lower than the opposite.

I will say that I appreciate these people though, who are willing to take that chance and report, but as you all say, they may be biased without possibly realizing themselves.

[QUOTE=TNewton;2459614]I agree with Chubzy on this. There are some experienced reviewers who begin the review with "My good friend Mr. A from Big-Time Agency called me and told me that he had a new girl who just can't be missed and boy was he right. " I doubt that this reviewer would ever write anything negative about his "good friend' Mr. A's agency. Just last year there was a long time reviewer who wrote a typical over the top review of a new girl at his "friend's" agency. The review was quickly disputed by three other reviewers and the review disappeared.

I would also agree with PCode80 assessment of new girls. There are some experienced reviewers who love to boast that they were a new girl's first client. Does it really matter? A few years ago there was an exchange on the review board like this:

Reviewer 1: "I am happy to report that I was New Girl's first client on her very first day. ".

Reviewer 2: "No you weren't. I actually saw her the day before her official first day"..[/QUOTE]I hate to say it but this is actually one of the reasons I like to read the greenboard. These ego-oriented exchanges are somewhat funny. Trying to imagine how much fun the SPs are having reading them and just laughing in the background.

Saw her in mid winter. She's a bit more curvy that what I typically prefer (I typically prefer the slim / slender body type). She's an extremely easy going person so I can guarantee that breaking the ice isn't going to be a challenge with her. I had a multi-hour session with her and was confident enough to do so based on her overwhelmingly positive reviews. Plus I was celebrating something. She was dedicated to the session and didn't allow anything to distract her from pleasing and meeting my requests. I was very content. Even tough she's on a higher than average rate, I think she deserves it and I have placed her on my repeat list.

You all may see a few more since I realized I missed a few reviews from recent past in the green board. Might as well put them here.

[QUOTE=Hacsek;2459809]


The only thing it could possibly weed out are people that are infectious at the particular day of the test it's no guarantee someone testing negative may not get infected the very next day.
[/QUOTE]And that, is a 1000% enough, because if one is asymtomatic, it would stop the spread, LOL.

[QUOTE=PCode80;2460025]I hate to say it but this is actually one of the reasons I like to read the greenboard. These ego-oriented exchanges are somewhat funny. Trying to imagine how much fun the SPs are having reading them and just laughing in the background.[/QUOTE]You brought to mind for a quick conversation I had while with a girl who went under the radar last year but kept in contact with me four my multi HR needs, when I spoke to her of merb for the first time, she just said very softly. I haaate merrrrb.

I should have asked her for clarity at the time.

[QUOTE=PCode80;2460025]I hate to say it but this is actually one of the reasons I like to read the greenboard. These ego-oriented exchanges are somewhat funny. Trying to imagine how much fun the SPs are having reading them and just laughing in the background.[/QUOTE]You made me laugh here Some reviewers do not get it. They are reviewing themselves! I find them funny to read but always roll my eyes to the ceiling at the second or third O they gave to the girl haha.

[QUOTE=PCode80;2460021]Still, I don't get the appeal. I still think the risk of having an undesirable meeting is higher that way, and on the other hand you can just wait for a few weeks or so while proper intel can ultimately be gathered. I bet the SP is going to perform just as well on her third week than on her first week. I can't think of a situation where an SP will be better on her first week of work than on her forth week of work. I mean, maybe, but I feel the chances of that happening is much lower than the opposite.

I will say that I appreciate these people though, who are willing to take that chance and report, but as you all say, they may be biased without possibly realizing themselves.[/QUOTE]I can think of easily.

Say she gets some bad clients up front and gets taken advantage of, and she becomes guarded the rest of the way going forward.

[QUOTE=Kabukicho;2460082]I should have asked her for clarity at the time.[/QUOTE]It's because of YMMV. It has nothing to do with your look, body type, sexual talent, cock size, age. It's all about YMMV.

So they do not like being reviewed. Being tagged with acronyms they do or not do. Because they might very well do something they won't to another dude or the opposite.

Took me a few years to get that. So yes only a few minority like the boards all others will hate it soon enough. But that said the forum boards are vital to work your way around all the baits and switch.

[QUOTE=TNewton;2459614]I agree with Chubzy on this. There are some experienced reviewers who begin the review with "My good friend Mr. A from Big-Time Agency called me and told me that he had a new girl who just can't be missed and boy was he right. " I doubt that this reviewer would ever write anything negative about his "good friend' Mr. A's agency. Just last year there was a long time reviewer who wrote a typical over the top review of a new girl at his "friend's" agency. The review was quickly disputed by three other reviewers and the review disappeared.

I would also agree with PCode80 assessment of new girls. There are some experienced reviewers who love to boast that they were a new girl's first client. Does it really matter? A few years ago there was an exchange on the review board like this:

Reviewer 1: "I am happy to report that I was New Girl's first client on her very first day. ".

Reviewer 2: "No you weren't. I actually saw her the day before her official first day".

Reviewer 3: "You're both wrong. I actually saw her the week before when my good friend Mr. A from Big-Time Agency asked me to do a trial run and provide feedback. ".

Bottom Line: Some experienced reviewers can be trusted and some can't.[/QUOTE]Yes there are those kinds of writeups at he green board. Sometimes I guess being a thread starter for a girl, has something to do with it or the over all sense of TOFTH, that's all as well.

But there is a differnce for those which it matters, between a 'new girl' (to the roster of an agency) versus a new girl to an agency, that's also new to the scene, and you're the first client. Those are the ones who the posters brag about.

Earlier this year I had a girl new to the agency and I learned from her she had come from recently stopped working at a completely unadvertised, word of mouth only, establishment. That was the pits. How / why she bothered to work there I did not ask, but she left as well as took her friend w / her. So, though new, she wasnt new to the scene.

[QUOTE=Kabukicho;2460086]I can think of easily.

Say she gets some bad clients up front and gets taken advantage of, and she becomes guarded the rest of the way going forward.[/QUOTE]I guess but if that happens, frankly, I imagine that's something that is unlikely to happen through those agency reviewers because that's bad for business. That could happen to anyone at anytime.

I'm planning to visit the city in the fall. Hopefully things stabilized by then. Not sure how the scene will look like at that point.

[QUOTE=Jalimon2;2460087]It's because of YMMV. It has nothing to do with your look, body type, sexual talent, cock size, age. It's all about YMMV.[/QUOTE]So if it YMMV has nothing to do with those things you mentioned. Then what exactly determines "your mileage may vary"?

On a different topic, I think the green forum doesn't allow the girls to reply to the reviews. ONLY UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES sometimes the girls reply. That just seems unfair. However, some of the girls have really good threads. Like the threads help people believe they're honest workers because there are no troublesome reviews. I think the positive experience threads help the girls get new customers.