Thread: Rants and WTF are you talking about and Coronavirus!
+
Add Report
Results 871 to 885 of 12401
-
05-26-23 15:22 #11531
Posts: 1499Originally Posted by Pessimist [View Original Post]
-
05-25-23 18:58 #11530
Posts: 1499Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
-
05-25-23 18:56 #11529
Posts: 1499Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
Kinda ironic to reference degrees as a measure usefulness coming from someone who seems to take a cliche position on institutional education. Even more absurd coming from someone who studied "communications" over half a decade. Even more ironic when individual is so terrible at communicating.
Most people I knew in college who studied "communications" were not the most book smart but were actually generally sociable and attractive people who were probably able to salvage a useless field with their natural attributes. Must be terrible to be the oddball who has neither of the latter attributes.
Sorry that I used so many 3 syllable words. You can get through it, just have an adult help you read it.
-
05-25-23 14:24 #11528
Posts: 6846Originally Posted by EscapeArtist [View Original Post]
- I had to lecture you on covid-vaccine issues.
- I had to lecture you on side effects.
Your degree still makes you useless. That must hurt like hell!
-
05-25-23 14:22 #11527
Posts: 6846Originally Posted by Ararat [View Original Post]
-
05-25-23 07:18 #11526
Posts: 1499Originally Posted by Pessimist [View Original Post]
"Cartel: combination of independent commercial or industrial enterprises designed to limit competition or fix prices. ".
Prices suddenly rose in Fall 2021, not gradually over several months or years.
Pretty sure no one with common sense thinks that each girl coincidentally, independently decided to raise prices because they independently felt an organic shift in the price-supply relationship. Price increase happened rather abruptly and to think that it happened organically without any collusion between individual girls is quite naive.
Neither does the existence of an external stimulus negate collusion. In combination with the choke on supply, the abrupt price increase actually gives more plausibility that there were active measures to raise prices.
Proactively raising prices: no; deliberate reactionary raising prices in unison, yes.
Asserting otherwise is just obviously ignoring the most likely scenario in favor of a much less likely possibility in order to be argumentative for the sake of ego.
-
05-24-23 16:03 #11525
Posts: 1386Poor analysis as always, not surprising. A cartel always implies some amount of discussion and agreement between cartel members to divvy up the market, control supply, and control the prices in a collusive manner.
I am not aware of any cartels in which the key cartel members do not explicitly have a formal or informal agreement to not only collude but also agree on the terms. Such as who gets how much territory / demand, what the pricing should be and so on.
This article talked about Romanian authorities cracking down on trafficking and making some progress. If that brought down supply (for which no reliable data is available. Pre and post anti trafficking), then I postulated that could have led to a higher trajectory of prices. There were discussions on this board in the past that a potential supply decline (due to a rise in Romanian living standards) could lead to supply limitations and hence price increases. Those did not come to pass yet enough to make an adverse impact but possibly regulatory crackdown did.
And most importantly, none of that implies any existence of a cartel nor their ability to influence prices. This was not a pro active measure by the cartel, let alone that there was a cartel. Govt choked off the supply routes. The alleged cartel did not sit together and agree to limit supply or price at higher level.
But anyway, none of this matters. Your intent as always is to be a destructive gadfly, bring up the CCP trollfarm talking points and generally show that you continue to be a useless, shit eating pest. Any detailed explanation will be called mental gymnastics; even a two syllable word is mental gymnastics to a retard like you. Then the conversation meanders into a series of time wasting nonsense. Which for you is ok because you get paid a couple of remnimbi per thousand messages by MacShitBing.
-
05-23-23 21:07 #11524
Posts: 24501Originally Posted by PaulInZurich [View Original Post]
-
05-23-23 15:24 #11523
Posts: 2611Originally Posted by Sirioja [View Original Post]
Originally Posted by Sirioja [View Original Post]
-
05-23-23 10:45 #11522
Posts: 2611Originally Posted by Sirioja [View Original Post]
There is no Gran San Bernardino. I understand it's (Gran San Bernardo vs San Bernardino) an easy mistake to make when having bad eye sight and just driving through. Of course if you actually cycle there, you can't confuse them.
Great St Bernard (FR: Col du Grand St-Bernard, IT: Colle del Gran San Bernardo) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_St_Bernard_Pass..
Little St Bernard (FR: Col du Petit Saint-Bernard, IT: Colle del Piccolo San Bernardo) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_St_Bernard_Pass..
San Bernardino (IT: Passo del San Bernardino): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Bernardino_Pass..
First two are named after Bernard of Menthon (1020-1081) founder of the hospice at Great St Bernard.
Third one is named after Bernardino of Siena (1380-1444).
-
05-22-23 21:51 #11521
Posts: 24501Originally Posted by PaulInZurich [View Original Post]
-
05-22-23 16:37 #11520
Posts: 2611So after proving so much lack of knowledge of Alpine passes for a "cyclist", today is time to clarify all that car talk bullshit.
"Asian electronics shit haldex really not sporty" - You do realize that Haldex is a Swedish company, right?
"top level number 1 Bugatti is French hands made" , "Bugatti which are the highest level cars", "Bugatti which have no competitor".
You do know that Bugatti Veyron and Bugatti Chiron use Haldex AWD, right?
-
05-16-23 18:27 #11519
Posts: 1499Originally Posted by Ararat [View Original Post]
-
05-14-23 21:54 #11518
Posts: 454Originally Posted by Pistons [View Original Post]
You can't just choose the findings you like and claim others are fake.
I don't think about Dunning-Kruger a lot but maybe this has been a thorn in your side? You've been told about it a lot, haven't you?
-
05-14-23 13:49 #11517
Posts: 6846Guess what, it was fake science all along. Made by 2 incompetent people. And everyone who has ever referenced it themselves, even though the effect never existed, actually kinda makes it somewhat right.
But not because dumb people overestimate themselves, but because dumb people take education literature as fact without question their brainwashing.
And a search here on ISG tells you who has referenced the effect in the past.
https://fortune.com/2023/05/08/what-...e-john-cleese/