Thread: Pune
+
Add Report
Results 40,081 to 40,095 of 45249
-
05-03-13 21:37 #5169Senior Member

Posts: 209Returns on investment
visited this spa 5times. all therapist are from mizo. every time i took 90mins deep tissue for 2k. first 4 times got denied for extras from 2 therapist. 5th time another therapist was alloted for me. she would always give me a smile when ever i visited this spa. again took deep tissue for 90mins. after an hr of good massage. asked for extras. got turned down. sweet talked to her saying you always look at me and smile and blah blah. she agreed for top less hj with touvhing and sucking boobs for 500. to my surprise she kissed my neck and started dfk. while doing that. i guided my hand in her underwear. and played with pussy. ger pussy was very wet. i guess she was really horny from her way of dfk and wet pussy. asked for bj. agreed for another 500 for bj. sucked for a min and stopped saying that she doesn't iike the oil taste in her mouth and thst next time she will give good bj without applying oil on my jonny. after 20mins i cummed. she stictly said not to tell anybody about she giving extras as this place is very strict about it. and she doesn't give any extrss to anyone. don't know if she was telling truth. or may be i look like someone she adores. just no idea. don't want to reveal this spa so soon. got membership for 10k which includes 10 deep tissue massages for 90mins each.
-
05-03-13 21:32 #5168Regular Member

Posts: 2R00pinder
She is an typical Punjabi HW, fair, bit fat, good height, big melons, an independent around bbwadi. Tried by one of my friend around 2 yrs ago but that no is changed. Should not cause much damage. If someone has tried recently, pl share experience.
Originally Posted by Ujwala
[View Original Post]
-
05-03-13 21:04 #5167Senior Member

Posts: 463With you
With you, it is only to save embarrassment from Society and Family, every one succumbs for illegal gratification.
Originally Posted by Masti Baba
[View Original Post]
Even if WG makes a statement she was indulging in the act without any financial consideration and was cohabiting out of her personal will as an adult, the LE " make out" a case of the WG having accepting money for services or soliciting from a public place to the extent LE authorities produce (Stock) witnesses.
The problem is not only embarrassment of being caught but given the delays in getting Justice raises its own hassles by way of frequent adjournments on various grounds, the bail process, social stigma, wastage of time and money, forces the mongerer to
"Settle" the issue rather getting into legal process.
-
05-03-13 18:34 #5166Senior Member

Posts: 209Returns on investment
finally got returns on investment made at a spa. visited this spa 5 times. paid 2000 per visit for 90mins massage. for first 4 times got denied for extras by 2 therapist. 5th time a another therapist who would always give a smile everytime i visited this spa. was appointed to me. took 90 mins deep tissue as usual. after 1hr i asked her for extras. she denied saying nobody gives extra at this spa. sweet talked to her saying you always smile at me and blah blah. finally she agreed fo are hj with topless for 500. i don't know if she was really horny but she gave me dfk. sucked her tits. she didn't stop me. guided my hands in her underwear. asked for bj. she said 500 extra for it. said ok. she gave bj for a 1min and stopped saying she is getting oil taste in her mouth. and assured me next time she won't put oil and give good bj. played with her pussy which was really wet. this all went for 20mins and finakky i cummed. gave her 1k. she gave strict warning not to tell any other therapist or anybody. as she never give services to anybody. don't knw if she was tellinh truth. but i feel she was really horny with her dfk and her wet pussy. guys don't ask about this spa. as i don't want to reveal it this soon. also got membership for 1yr for 10k in which il get 10 deep tissue massage for 90 mins each.
she is avg looking mizo. aged around 30. really small boobs. but very sensitive nipples.
-
05-03-13 18:15 #5165Regular Member

Posts: 2Panvel Raid
Hi Folks,
Panvel Kapal has been raided yesterday. Customer are asked to pay 1 lac. All the kittens are still in jail.
Be careful and good luck.
Reagards,
ArcherRaj
-
05-03-13 13:00 #5164Senior Member

Posts: 137LEs are not taking the support of law. If you are bold enough to face the public / society / family and fight you will probably win with flying colours. But there are two things.
Originally Posted by Dipak Chopra
[View Original Post]
1. One does not want to get caught and get publicity for such thing.
2. LEs are capable of putting any charge on you. And then it will be up to you to prove it wrong.
The only reasons for such raids are for publicity or bribe.
-
05-03-13 05:39 #5163Senior Member

Posts: 110this is getting scary. they are not only arresting the customers but they are revealing the identity and their profession to the media. now two things must have prompted this action:
Originally Posted by tonyindian
[View Original Post]
firstly they didn't receive their cut by the month end (this looks like the real reason).
or.
secondly they wanted to hog the limelight and show that they are not sitting idle. may be that is the reason why all the newspaper had the name of all the officials involved in the raid.
what ever it is, pune is getting very unsafe. [CodeWord126] are at large and people who are having consensual sex are arrested and harassed. the link posted by dipak says "the criminal law amendment bill. 2013 makes a distinction between sexual exploitation and consensual adult sex work." it seems this is not applicable in this city.
-
05-02-13 12:30 #5162Senior Member

Posts: 142Customer arrest doesn't make sense.
I am also not a lawyer but it just doesn't make sense. The new bill passed in March was supposed to make life easier. My reading of the change in this law was that prostitution by choice is not an offense. I think police doesn't understand the change in the law.
Originally Posted by TonyIndian
[View Original Post]
http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...y-or-practices
Need to keep a close eye on how this case is handled.
Thanks
-
05-02-13 10:18 #5161Regular Member

Posts: 11HHmmm
Looks like there is more money in busting rackets that has no patronage than catching two wheelers without license.
Originally Posted by Thrusting Rod
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 08:42 #5160Senior Member

Posts: 611Please stop Bullshitting.
How did this monger give you the number?
Originally Posted by SoberC
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 07:46 #5159Regular Member

Posts: 1New haven on Nagar Road, anyone aware?
Hi,
I met a friend after a long time and he shared his experience on the nagar road.
Said, His friend took him to a small time hotel on nagar road, it was after kharadi or around that place.
The girls were manipuri and very cooperative.
Did anyone been that side? Or know which hotel was he referring to?
I would love to get the name and share the details.
Anyone aware?
Regards
-
05-02-13 06:53 #5158Senior Member

Posts: 258the dumbasses are probably referring to this:
Originally Posted by thrusting rod
[View Original Post]
http://www.ncpcr.gov.in/acts/immoral_traffic_prevention_act_%28itpa%29_1956.pdf
i'm not a lawyer but in no part of that text does it state in "section 5" that consensual sex with a prostitute is an offense. 5c is the one which comes closest but it still doesn't make sense in this case. the onus is on them to prove that the girls were "trafficked" before arresting the customers:
5a. whoever recruits, transports, transfers, harbours, or receives a person for the purpose of prostitution by means of, — (a) threat or use of force or coercion, abduction, fraud, deception; or (be) abuse of power or a position of vulnerability; or (see) giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of such person having control over another person, commits the offence of trafficking in persons.
explanation.
—where any person recruits, transports, transfers, harbours or receives a person for the purposes of prostitution, such person shall, until the contrary is proved, be presumed to have recruited, transported, transferred, harboured or received the person with the intent that the person shall be used for the purpose of prostitution.
5b. (1) any person who commits trafficking in persons shall be punishable on first conviction with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years and in the event of a second or subsequent conviction with imprisonment for life.
(2) any person who attempts to commit, or abets trafficking in persons shall also be deemed to have committed such trafficking in persons and shall be punishable with the punishment hereinbefore described.
5c. any person who visits or is found in a brothel for the purpose of sexual exploitation of any victim of trafficking in persons shall on first conviction be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees or with both and in the event of a second or subsequent conviction with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to fifty thousand rupees.
-
05-02-13 04:07 #5157Senior Member

Posts: 611Even the over zealous Cop in Mumbai never arrested customers. This event in Pune is the first time I have heard of the use of section 5 (whatever that means) to arrest customers. The Juhu rave party arrests were over the use of drugs, but not for fucking a girl. I hope the girls understand that they should change their mindset & not insist on Hotels. They can refuse down market places, but surely for upmarket society's they should have no problem.
Originally Posted by TonyIndian
[View Original Post]
-
05-02-13 03:53 #5156Regular Member

Posts: 11Shoma
Hi all,
Was given the number of Shoma by one of the mongers. Bengali babe. Good service.
-
05-02-13 02:11 #5155Senior Member

Posts: 258" The customers include a web designer from Kolhapur, two scrap dealers from Shirur and a farmer from Wagholi."
Originally Posted by Thrusting Rod
[View Original Post]
LOL, I can just imagine the cops intimidating these people for that information. They probably thought they could pay their way out of it. The police have no right to ask a person's occupation or leak that to the press. This is disgusting. Our country is becoming disgusting with each passing day. Cops who don't know the law, no one has any understanding of basic rights.
If the cops are going to play hardball then there is no point in cooperating with them. In such a situation one may merely state their name and address & then shut up untill a lawyer is at the scene. Let them try and argue with an expensive lawyer and corrupt magistrate.








Reply With Quote



